Take the 2-minute tour ×
Software Quality Assurance & Testing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for software quality control experts, automation engineers, and software testers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A real life example- Linux Kernel A feature B was tested and released,

Linux Kernel A+1 feature B+1 was tested and released

Now feature B+1 is ported back into Linux Kernel A

How should I call the testing of the this third stage ? Regression is the closest thing, but technically it refers to combinations that were tested before and are being retested now.

share|improve this question
    
I think "backward porting testing", or the more succinct "backport testing", gets the point across. –  user246 Sep 10 '12 at 13:12

2 Answers 2

Perhaps "Backwards Compatibility Testing"?

share|improve this answer
    
Again- close, but not exact. The ported feature will be an integral part of the older Kernel –  Rsf Sep 10 '12 at 11:52
    
Got it. Perhaps just "Older Kernel Enhancement Testing" then. –  Joe Strazzere Sep 10 '12 at 13:48

I wouldn't call it backward porting testing at all. Within A, the feature from B is brand new, making it A+2. It's a new feature in its own right. The fact that A, B, A+1 and B+1 were tested and found stable doesn't guarantee that A+(B+1) will be bug free. There isn't another name for that other than "testing".

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.