Take the 2-minute tour ×
Software Quality Assurance & Testing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for software quality control experts, automation engineers, and software testers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In my firm we have the practice that the test phase is made by the same people who develop the software and you are responsible for what the client does.

The organization has 2-3 software packages with a lot of code that is always modified everyday in each part or we add new functions to them.

Please can you tell me what the professionals (if there are) do to leave all the development and test to the same people (1) and the tests and what are the cons (if there are) to assigning testing to another person or team?

Can you show me a model of testing process that has been successfully applied and that works well in a firm of 50 people who work on different projects, divided into teams of 3-4 people?

share|improve this question
    
Frank, I tried to clean up your English. I hope I didn't change the nature of your question. –  user246 May 31 '13 at 14:59
2  
Are you having quality problems? Do you ship with lots of bugs or not? Why do you think you need a testing process? –  Phil Kirkham May 31 '13 at 16:25
    
I would follow Phil's questions... How complex those packages are? Can they be tested in isolation by non IT people from your organization? At what level do you find problems? When integrating the packages coming from different teams or not? –  dzieciou Jun 1 '13 at 9:16
add comment

2 Answers

The short answer to your question is that if the same person does both the development and the testing, he's going to bring a lot of assumptions into the tests. On the other hand, he probably already knows the weak points and how the code works, so he's got a lot to offer in the testing process too.

It doesn't sound like you have dedicated testers, so working in those constraints, I think one of the first steps you could do to improve your tests would be to have coming up with and designing test cases be a collaborative process. With teams of 3 or 4, that shouldn't add too much overhead to people's jobs and will get more diverse ideas into the process.

Having dedicated QA engineers really has value. Quality and testing, not development of features or behaviors, is going to be on their mind full time and they're going to add a lot of depth to your testing, but I don't know if that's an option available to you in your organization.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Here are a thoughts from my experience in making a transition, small team, no dedicated testers towards adding a test member. Your situation (company, product, customers, technology) is probably different that I experienced, so please take caution:

  • At some point in the project, frequent releases of new functionality requires the overhead of running regression testing on the old
    functionality. It can be more effective to have a test team handle
    the regression testing, so the developers can concentrate on new
    functionality. (preferred automated regression)

  • Be careful when introducing a test team member, and make sure that
    the current developers don't relax their personally quality
    standards. The current dev team should not relax, assuming the test team will take on the testing they were previously doing. This may
    cause a paradox, adding testers results in poor quality.

Sounds like you have multiple project teams. Perhaps try your new practice on one team only, as an experiment.

Good luck

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.