Software Quality Assurance & Testing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for software quality control experts, automation engineers, and software testers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've tried to use soapUI to set up a Boundary Scan security test, using the sample wsdl provided in the soapUI tutorial. I changed it so that it has a restriction on the username field for the loginRequest action (cf. below). Yet whenever I try to run the security test, the boundary scan gets "SKIPPED". No error messages get displayed. Does anyone know how to set up a (working) Boundary Scan with SoapUI's free edition?

Changes to WSDL
I replaced the following line

<xsd:schema targetNamespace="">


   <!-- CHANGED/ADDED -->
    <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="" targetNamespace="" xmlns:tns="" >
         <xsd:simpleType name="usernameType">
               <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
               <xsd:length value="9"/>
         <!-- END ADDED -->


  <wsdl:message name="loginRequest">
    <wsdl:part name="username" type="xsd:string"/>


  <wsdl:message name="loginRequest">
    <wsdl:part name="username" type="tns:usernameType"/> <!-- CHANGED -->

I've provided more detail of what exactly I did on soapUI's bug tracker board and I'm using soapUI v4.6.4. I'm not sure it's a bug or a simple mistake on my part, so any help would be much appreciated!

UPDATE: When selecting the parameter in the Boundary Scan window, soapUI does complain "parameter is missing type in schema" - which I can't quite understand, because the type is there; cf. XML snippet above.

share|improve this question
I just tried the same exercise with our own WSDL, and got a different "error" message: "No restrictions in schema are specified for this parameter!" Turns out soapUI has the xsd namespace hard-coded in; changing it in our own WSDL to xsd (so it reads xsd:restriction) fixes the issue for our own WSDL. No idea what the initial error (with the sample WSDL) is about, though. Hints are still appreciated. But at least it's now working for us... – Christian Jan 28 '14 at 13:49
It might be an idea to move your comment above to an answer to your own question so as to preserve it for the future. – Steve Barnes Nov 18 '15 at 18:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.