The standards tag has no wiki summary.
1
vote
1answer
63 views
I should follow ISO 12207 but how should I verify integration/code without testing?
I am forced to follow ISO 12207 for systematic approach. I have been reading a lot here and found similar questions, yet not the same one and definitely not any suitable answer.
According to this ...
3
votes
0answers
69 views
What are the implications of adding ISO 15288 after ISO 12207?
This question is aimed at QA people who have already adopted ISO 12207.
Do any of you have experience with ISO 15288 as well?
How does the act of adopting 15288 after starting with 12207 affect ...
0
votes
1answer
139 views
What other standards exist for Hardware QA?
I have been tasked with considering standards that can be used for hardware testing and QA - the hardware in this case being, for example, DAQ (DAC/ADC) and timing systems for diagnostics in a physics ...
2
votes
2answers
181 views
ISTQB: testing = analysis but dynamic testing != dynamic analysis?
This is more like an academic question. Although, common perception is that dynamic analysis is testing itself, most of advanced sources (but AFAIK also the ISTQB) distinct between:
dynamic testing ...
1
vote
6answers
393 views
Validation and verification in CMMi, ISO, IEEE. What should I refer to?
Working on my master thesis, today I found this site (I previously asked on programmers) so I hope you will not mind if I ask here to get more great answers.
The thing is that I have to classify ...
4
votes
2answers
239 views
Differences between Standard for Software Component Testing (BCS, SIGIST, 2001) and BS 7925-2:1998
What (if any) are the differences between The Standard for Software Component Testing (from the British Computing Society SIGIST and available for free) and BS 7925-2 (which is available to purchase ...
