Tag Info

New answers tagged

0

Visual regression testing is getting a momentum as far as I can see. I started to collect information and do some basic testing with some of them. Here are a couple of places/tools you could check: Thoughtworks radar section on those tools: "This has given rise to a variety of visual regression testing tools, including CSS Critic, dpxdt, Huxley, ...


0

We have started to trial this - http://code.google.com/p/qualitybots/ A project from the Google test team, it's quite a good blog to read. Although at the moment, we heavily test using crossbrowsertesting.com and saucelabs. We split the testing of our websites on different browsers in to three different categories. Functional - Ensuring key process and ...


0

Must say never had success with this using an automated approach. In the end always ended up using in cash terms more expert resource than cheaper eye ball resource. The problem with the last project where I saw this tried was the environment and application changes just came too quickly to gain from unchanged repeated testing; despite the client thinking ...


2

The most efficient tool for testing the appearance of a website is still the human eye and brain. That said, if you want or need to automate, image comparison is probably the least effective method because even with fuzzy logic it can generate far too many false positives. All it takes is a change in hardware (a different monitor or video card - this will ...


1

Yes, we do just that. We use Python and Coverage. I am curious what is business reason to eliminate unit tests. Unit tests are much closer to code and if any fails, finding and fixing the bug is much easier. The only reason to eliminate unit test is if another unit test covered the same execution path. OK, after comment from OP: yes, it is valid reason to ...



Top 50 recent answers are included