Reputation
3,202
Next privilege 3,500 Rep.
Protect questions
Badges
1 7 35
Impact
~143k people reached

May
24
awarded  Self-Learner
May
23
comment Is it worth investing much time into iteration testing?
Good question :) I want to point out that you haven't reaped the full benefit of your automated tests yet. They will continue to provide value for future iterations as well, as regression tests.
May
23
comment Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
Thank you very much to those who have added to this post!
May
23
revised Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
deleted 1228 characters in body
May
23
answered Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
May
23
comment What do you do when you encounter overloaded terminology in your workspace?
SharePoint has the advantage of being liked by non-techies. I like the ability to link as I use the terms in a wiki, but my audience is almost always technical, and they like wikis also.
May
23
revised Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
See "ETA" in edit
May
23
comment Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
You misunderstand the purpose of the checklist. The goal is to convey experience with testing. Newer testers are more likely to think about functional issues when reducing a bug (in fact, you do precisely this!). More experienced testers know that these bugs are fairly easy, but what about intermittent bugs where you can follow the exact same steps and reproduce it once, but not the next time? Memory, CPU, race conditions, timeouts, etc. can all play into these bugs. How do you reduce them? That's where a list of steps / tricks comes in handy.
May
23
revised Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
shortened title
May
23
asked Does anyone have a good list of steps for reducing a bug?
May
23
comment Will the new ISO/IEC 29119 Software Testing standard work with agile methodologies like Scrum?
I disagree. The problem isn't getting the respect of the business folk, it's finding good technical companies that recognize that software is a unique business that traditional business-folk just don't understand. The most skilled members of the testing community tend to shun standards like these, instead choosing to work at companies that respect their talents. These standards have been around for a while, and the best companies generally ignore them.
May
23
comment What do you do when you encounter overloaded terminology in your workspace?
A wiki can be a useful place to define terms. If the company uses them differently than the general test community, you can give the company definition and then include at the bottom a link to the more common definition outside of the company.
May
20
comment What additional benefits does an QA /Developer engineer bring to a project
+1 for code reviews / testability awareness!
May
20
comment Whether to choose Selenium over Watir or Lightweight Test Automation when testing web applications created using C Sharp?
As I understand it, the concern about x vs y is that people are likely to fall into camps if the question is wide open, plus the question of simply x vs y doesn't necessarily solve a real problem. This question has a lot of other details that affect whether x or y is more appropriate, and seems open to suggestions of z or w, plus is very clearly a real problem for which the OP needs a solution. I think those are key factors.
May
20
answered Whether to choose Selenium over Watir or Lightweight Test Automation when testing web applications created using C Sharp?
May
19
comment Where can I find some amusing cartoons about software testing?
Please edit this with the duplicate revisions. I think this is very helpful when framed as communicating the role of the tester using humor. I know I could use good comics to post in my cubicle to reduce dev / test tension and help explain some of the more, ah, "challenging" tester behaviors.
May
19
comment Should you preload DLL's in performance tests?
"First run" performance might be something you want to check. So, these can both be performance tests. I'd say don't load for most performance tests, for consistency; but be aware that you are missing some key scenarios, and decide if you need to make first run performance tests. Keep in mind that first run is your end user's first impression. I've also found that performance testing is often where the most interesting concurrency issues are discovered on large teams.
May
19
accepted Is a distinction between “testing” and “checking” useful?
May
19
comment Is a distinction between “testing” and “checking” useful?
Thanks a ton for stopping by and posting! This is very helpful.
May
18
revised Testing of automated scripts
Added info about testing the test harness, which really does deserve extra testing.