meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | May 10 at 10:18 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
|
Jan 14 |
comment |
What common browser plugins should be tested against? AdBlock, NoScript, Ghostery... |
|
Jan 11 |
answered | What tools are available for testing client/server software in various network topologies? |
|
Jan 3 |
answered | How does ITIL training benefit my software testing career |
|
Dec 29 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Nov 17 |
suggested | suggested edit on Is there recording software with bookmark frames on the fly? |
|
Nov 13 |
comment |
Is it fair to report a bug discovered during review without performing a test? All those could work fine. Bug tracking system would be probably easy place, if you can enter them in a way that doesn't bother everyone every day. |
|
Nov 13 |
answered | Is it fair to report a bug discovered during review without performing a test? |
|
Nov 5 |
comment |
How Does System Testing Differ From System Integration Testing (SIT)? @Dan If you build all those parts yourself and they are all complete programs, you do integration tests for subparts of A and B, system tests for A and B and system integration tests for combination of A and B. If A and B are not complete systems themselves, you don't have any system integration testing to be done. |
|
Nov 4 |
revised |
How Does System Testing Differ From System Integration Testing (SIT)? Added Wikipedia links |
|
Nov 4 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Nov 4 |
comment |
How Does System Testing Differ From System Integration Testing (SIT)? I would call testing parts of the system, possibly with mocks, just "integration testing" and system integration testing would be different thing. Just goes to show that it's good to make sure others are using the terms in the same way. :-) |
|
Nov 4 |
answered | How Does System Testing Differ From System Integration Testing (SIT)? |
|
Nov 2 |
comment |
Validation and verification in CMMi, ISO, IEEE. What should I refer to? It probably should apply to both definitions. The only way to know is to ask what the terms mean in certain context. I gave one interpretation, others have given others. I could add to my answer that not only tell which interpretation you are going to use, tell why you are using it. |
|
Nov 2 |
comment |
Validation and verification in CMMi, ISO, IEEE. What should I refer to? Apparently the ISO standard makes another division which might be as sensible. It's just on completely other level. |
|
Nov 2 |
answered | Validation and verification in CMMi, ISO, IEEE. What should I refer to? |
|
Nov 2 |
answered | Is there traceability matrix in agile? |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
The structure of test logs? @deepz Write the test log so that someone else can understand it. This doesn't mean that the log entry needs to be long, but it should describe things in context. It is also a wonder how much details one can forget in a year. So, write down what matters, but only that. |
|
Sep 22 |
comment |
The structure of test logs? I would add that even if it's just for you, consider if anyone else needs to read them afterwards and add information accordingly. Possibly next person doing your job at some point? |
|
Aug 20 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Aug 20 |
revised |
Updates to scripts in test lab Added context |
