| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 33 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | May 9 at 9:46 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
I am a robot. I can't remember how I passed the captcha.
|
Jul 27 |
comment |
Obtaining information about a socket @SamWoods I'm not trying to check if IPv4 is enabled on the system (which is what I believe the text you cited is talking about). I'm trying to obtain information about existing socket from outside of the application |
|
May 28 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together Then that idea is completely hidden in the answer. (You don't even mention Selenium at all!) As I understand it, you are basically saying that fitnesse is obsolete and it does not lead to clean design. Interesting indeed, but NaA. |
|
May 22 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together Although this sounds reasonable and valid, it does not answer the question "How do fitnesse and selenium work together". (Nor the other, which was thankfully been edited out by you.) |
|
May 21 |
comment |
Keyboard visualisation tool? @user867 Just imagine a video about Vim features where author would need to constantly interrupt his talk by announcements like "now I am presing 'Shift+G'...". |
|
May 21 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together So what I suggest is splitting the Q by removing the "state" part from this Q. Leave the F&S other part as a) there already are two relevant answers and b) it is a good, interesting question that is likely to help people and earn you rep---also in future. If you really want to ask the other part, ask it separately. |
|
May 21 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together This does not answer the question at all. |
|
May 21 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together Then the other point is that question like "state of play of XYZ" may be interesting now, but actually the correctness of any the answer is likely to change over time. Also it is quite vague... |
|
May 21 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together The main point is that you have two questions in one post: 1 - "state of play" 2 - fitnesse & selenium. This is dangerous because you actually split potential answerers into two groups (those answering 1 and those answering 2) but you can only accept one answer. Please read this question, it says it quite well. |
|
May 20 |
comment |
How do fitnesse and selenium work together Please do not ask multiple questions in one post. I suggest you try to split it, although I'm not sure if the "State of play" part would qualify as a real and helpful question (see FAQ). |
|
May 19 |
comment |
Getting older (any) Firefox version @strugee Thanks for improving the answer. Could you point us to list of mirrors? |
|
May 17 |
comment |
What types of testing are LEAST suited to using pairwise testing (and similar test design approaches)? @user246 Why don't you just give us link to the papers? And BTW, what comment you are talking about? There is no other than yours at time I am reading it... |
|
May 9 |
comment |
Capture screen during exploratory testing If you are testing without test plan and test cases, You're Doing It Wrong. It's a common misunderstanding that exploratory testing does not have plans and test cases---it does, it's just that you create them on the run, as you continuously find bugs and/or understand the application. |
|
May 9 |
comment |
Best guidelines for bug reporting? +1 as n-in-1 is The Ultimate Mess Generator. Testing for almost 5 years in teams from 1 to 50 testers, I have learned that very little worse can happen to a bug than being messed with another one. |