| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Austin, TX | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years |
| seen | 33 mins ago | |
| stats | profile views | 109 |
|
Jun 15 |
revised |
Should a test method test only one condition? deleted 5 characters in body |
|
Jun 15 |
revised |
Should a test method test only one condition? "club" -> "include" |
|
Jun 15 |
comment |
Should a test method test only one condition? Well then I learned something new today. I am going to take the liberty of changing "club" to "include", which hopefully means the right thing in both our worlds. |
|
Jun 15 |
answered | Should a test method test only one condition? |
|
Jun 15 |
comment |
Should a test method test only one condition? Did you really mean "club" in the first sentence? I'm not being humorless; I just thought it might be a typo. Did you mean "clump"? |
|
Jun 14 |
answered | testing Touchscreen driver |
|
Jun 14 |
revised |
Documenting Unit Tests Corrected spelling |
|
Jun 14 |
answered | Documenting Unit Tests |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
Documenting Unit Tests Before I answer, can you clarify something about the extra unit tests? Would the extra unit tests stick to testing the interfaces that are part of the specification, or would they actually communicate with the internals of the implementation? |
|
Jun 13 |
accepted | What are some ways In which testing a mobile application is different from testing a PC application? |
|
Jun 12 |
comment |
References for resources used in test the "like this one" link is broken. |
|
Jun 11 |
comment |
Is it easier to write “correct” software in functional languages? This is really a topic for a language forum, not a QA forum. Yes, your question is about quality, but no, there are not a lot of functional programming experts/advocates hanging around here. |
|
Jun 11 |
comment |
Is it easier to write “correct” software in functional languages? Not necessarily. For example, You need to consider the language environment. If you use a functional language, will there be as rich an ecosystem of supporting libraries available is there are for more established, procedural languages? If not, you may need to write more code yourself. The more code you write, the more bugs you will produce. And yes, existing libraries may have bugs too, but if others are using and maintaining them, there are probably fewer bugs than in your brand-new code. |
|
Jun 11 |
answered | Is it easier to write “correct” software in functional languages? |
|
Jun 10 |
answered | Workflow shortcut to meet the release deadline |
|
Jun 9 |
answered | Do ISTQB/ISEB Testing Certificates prove someone can test? |
|
Jun 9 |
revised |
Are code reviews considered part of QA? added 4 characters in body |
|
Jun 9 |
answered | Are code reviews considered part of QA? |
|
Jun 9 |
comment |
Are code reviews considered part of QA? Can you describe what you mean when you say something is or isn't part of QA? Are you asking about organizational boundaries, or categories of work that someone should be capable of doing, or something else? |
|
Jun 9 |
comment |
How do I handle the login modal dialog created by onLoad in a WebDriver & Java based test automation Before calling driver.get(), one could create a second thread to interact with the blocking dialog. |