Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 150 Rep.
Create new tags
Badges
9
Newest
 Promoter
Impact
~3k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 6 votes cast
Jul
28
asked ISO 12207:2008 - are there still categories like “Primary”, “Supporting”, “Organizational”?
Jul
22
comment Establishing QA in a new company - models/guidelines to follow?
@lloyd The OP is asking about QA, not testing.
Jul
10
asked Is there any standard/guideline to follow on HW testing as ISO9126?
Jun
23
comment Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
Short, simple and makes sense.
Jun
23
accepted Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
Jun
22
awarded  Promoter
Jun
22
comment Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
See the OP, I included a screenshot of a book clearly showing how Functional suitability is classified as NFR.
Jun
22
revised Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
added 85 characters in body
Jun
22
comment Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
But you miss the point - Functional suitability is - according to ISO25010 - consider NON-FUNCTIONAL, which is the point of this post..it is one of the quality attribute. This is confirmed by other non-functional evaluation frameworks like SNAP and various book, the two of which I quoted.
Jun
18
revised Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
added 283 characters in body
Jun
17
comment Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
Yes I know that but the main issue here is why some authors, including peer reviewed papers, differ on what is functional and non-functional. Why some consider "functional suitability" functional and some do not? It is called "Suitablity" but on the other hand, it deals with "functional completeness, correctness etc.". Some non-functional view I saw simply verified no.of functions against the requirements, not their correct implementation.
Jun
16
revised Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
added 171 characters in body
Jun
16
asked Requirements confusion - Functional suitability as Non-functional characteristic (ISO25010)
Jun
16
comment Should test cases contain more than one step with expected result (ISO 29119 definition)
Well, I am in quite a formal environment and technically speaking, a test case is always a pair of INPUT and exp. OUTPUT, while a test can embrace a session or a series of test cases.
Jun
15
answered What is the difference between a software quality analyst, and a software tester
Jun
8
accepted Security testing - functional or non-functioal, ISO 9126 vs ISO 25010
Jun
2
asked Security testing - functional or non-functioal, ISO 9126 vs ISO 25010
May
22
accepted Functional or non-functional issue: a button kept pressed causes troubles
May
22
asked Functional or non-functional issue: a button kept pressed causes troubles
May
22
awarded  Curious