Timeline for How to handle dynamic changing ID's In XPath?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2020 at 10:58 | history | edited | JAINAM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 3, 2019 at 9:13 | comment | added | tjb | Also, don't forget that you can check multiple parts of an id: constant1-12232-constant2: "//*[contains(@id,'constant1') and contains(@id,'constant2)]" | |
| Apr 12, 2018 at 11:03 | vote | accept | Bharat Mane♦ | ||
| Apr 20, 2018 at 10:57 | |||||
| Mar 24, 2017 at 5:04 | vote | accept | Bharat Mane♦ | ||
| Mar 24, 2017 at 5:05 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2017 at 12:17 | vote | accept | Bharat Mane♦ | ||
| Mar 9, 2017 at 12:18 | |||||
| Dec 23, 2016 at 14:03 | history | edited | dzieciou | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Dec 22, 2016 at 9:05 | comment | added | Bharat Mane♦ | Yes, maximum time we avoids to use Absolute x-path, but sometimes relative xpath is not working while locating the element, in that case we have to use absolute xpath: in which we have to design absolute path from starting node to descent element node. | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 9:02 | history | edited | Bharat Mane♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved answer
|
| Nov 28, 2016 at 6:16 | comment | added | olyv | Imho, option 2 is not recommended, it is too brittle | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 9:10 | history | edited | Bharat Mane♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved answer
|
| Apr 29, 2016 at 14:33 | vote | accept | Bharat Mane♦ | ||
| May 16, 2016 at 14:00 | |||||
| Apr 28, 2016 at 9:32 | history | answered | Bharat Mane♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |