Timeline for Is it mandatory to include "Actual results" section in a Defect/Bug Report?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:45 | history | edited | Joe Strazzere | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:40 | comment | added | Michael Durrant | Management serves the purpose of setting the priority and standards. In some shops they may actually have the most knowledge but if everyone rows and no-one steers this boat is going nowhere despite all the puffing. | |
| Sep 12, 2016 at 13:26 | comment | added | Niels van Reijmersdal | QA manager makes a lot more sense than general management which I expected from your answer. :) | |
| Sep 12, 2016 at 10:53 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | Yup, really management. The QA Manager has the responsibility to get the QA systems set up to satisfy the needs of the business. | |
| Sep 12, 2016 at 10:25 | comment | added | Niels van Reijmersdal | Really management? They don't have to reproduce and fix the issue. Why would you let the person with the least knowledge decide about what is mandatory or not. As management I would expect the team to handle the defects to decide and set the process about what information is needed. Only in case of conflicts I would consult management. :) | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 22:10 | history | answered | Joe Strazzere | CC BY-SA 3.0 |