Timeline for Which software faults are the hardest to fix? ISTQB Foundation Level Exam question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 11, 2021 at 14:39 | answer | added | norwag | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 25, 2020 at 15:30 | answer | added | Oleg Mamulat | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 21, 2016 at 18:01 | answer | added | Steve Barnes | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 19, 2016 at 2:59 | vote | accept | Deepika Fernando | ||
Dec 19, 2016 at 2:54 | comment | added | Deepika Fernando | Yeah agree! Just finished my exam and happily, the exam did not have very vague questions like this. I mean, there were vague questions, but not so vague as this one | |
Dec 19, 2016 at 2:53 | comment | added | IAmMilinPatel | Deepika, This is the reason why many people don't support or consider certifications as a measure of one's ability to be good software tester. It's better you don't get too carried away with this and learn actual testing by practicing and interacting with people. | |
Dec 17, 2016 at 15:55 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | The question is indeed typical. The correct way to approach this is to memorize what the ISTQB deems is correct, not to actually try to make sense of these mostly-context-free questions. | |
Dec 17, 2016 at 12:53 | comment | added | Mark Amery | If this question is typical of the exam, then the exam is awful. You could make a reasonable case for any of these answers, depending upon when the fault is discovered, the overall complexity of each phase, the complexity of the fault, whether the workers responsible for the phase that contains the fault are even still available to fix it, and many other factors. | |
Dec 17, 2016 at 12:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSQA/status/810097993349206016 | ||
Dec 17, 2016 at 10:53 | answer | added | Niels van Reijmersdal | timeline score: 11 | |
Dec 17, 2016 at 8:28 | answer | added | Yu Zhang | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 17, 2016 at 5:29 | history | asked | Deepika Fernando | CC BY-SA 3.0 |