Timeline for Separate QA v.s. Scrum Team Member - How should QA be involved?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 at 8:57 | history | rollback | dvniel♦ |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Mar 19, 2020 at 12:38 | history | edited | JAINAM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2017 at 14:32 | comment | added | Ragnarsson | George, yeah I agree with the business goal. But from the QA's perspective, we always want to ensure software has the quality that would satisfy any stakeholders ;). | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 13:32 | comment | added | George | Louis, job is to provide the best possible feedback. What to do with this feedback is project/application managers problem. For most companies the goal is to make money, not produce best quality software :) | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 12:43 | comment | added | Ragnarsson | Thanks Dan, I found myself in exact situation you had. QAs take part in Daily Scrum and Retro, but like you said, QAs are more like observers. The thing is, all our suggestions, proposal for a change/improvement are left unheard, and it's pretty demotivated. I don't know how to improve things when our feedbacks are not taken into account. | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 10:51 | history | answered | dvniel♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |