Skip to main content
32 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 19, 2023 at 12:32 history protected CommunityBot
May 18, 2023 at 10:56 answer added Kanika Vatsyayan timeline score: 0
S Jan 1, 2021 at 15:03 history bounty ended alecxe
S Jan 1, 2021 at 15:03 history notice removed alecxe
Dec 26, 2020 at 15:00 answer added pavelsaman timeline score: 2
Dec 26, 2020 at 14:17 answer added Karunakaran timeline score: 1
S Dec 25, 2020 at 13:51 history bounty started alecxe
S Dec 25, 2020 at 13:51 history notice added alecxe Reward existing answer
Mar 2, 2020 at 15:23 answer added ToastMan timeline score: 2
Mar 2, 2020 at 12:29 history edited Mate Mrše CC BY-SA 4.0
added 7 characters in body
Apr 20, 2019 at 19:41 answer added Alex B timeline score: 5
Jan 2, 2018 at 22:07 answer added bta timeline score: 2
Jan 1, 2018 at 20:30 answer added Vishal Aggarwal timeline score: -1
Jun 25, 2017 at 18:38 answer added Aalok timeline score: 4
Jun 14, 2017 at 13:05 comment added Nathan I don't think the world is changing at the pace the OP thinks. There will be always be people behind the curve. Having good tests is hard, and people don't like doing difficult things if they can get away with it. I know from 1st hand experience that the software industry is enough of a friendly environment, that companies can get away with a quite large amount of lack of discipline, waste and poor practices before it actually sinks them. ... So cheer up :D
Jun 13, 2017 at 17:16 comment added David Cain Being strong on QA methodology is valuable when it comes to doing the work, but does not stand out on a resume. Anytime you are trying to justify your disciplines existence, you have already lost the argument.
Jun 13, 2017 at 16:40 answer added LeLetter timeline score: 9
Jun 13, 2017 at 13:24 answer added CaffeineAddiction timeline score: 5
Jun 13, 2017 at 12:53 comment added Keeta - reinstate Monica "Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach, lead." After you have been with a company long enough, study to become a manager. You don't have to know how to do automation, just how to lead those who do know how to do automation.
Jun 13, 2017 at 10:57 comment added Ian Newson My company only employs manual testers currently. While we do use automated testing to varying degrees, our testers aren't involved in this process at the moment, although we're keen for them to be. The skills employed by a manual tester are absolutely essential, even if going down the route of automated testing. Automated testing is not absolutely necessary.
Jun 12, 2017 at 15:17 answer added Niels van Reijmersdal timeline score: 3
Jun 12, 2017 at 14:43 answer added Peter M. - stands for Monica timeline score: 5
Jun 12, 2017 at 12:51 comment added Cronax You seem to make this very black-and-white, while the answer is probably a shade of grey. You don't have to become a developer in order to do test automation and when you do test automation it doesn't have to be the only thing that you do. A former colleague of mine was a manual tester with no software background at all (he was a former car mechanic) but he was able to learn a bit of coding so that he could make his life easier. The idea is to automate repetitive tasks so you can focus on finding the important bugs.
Jun 12, 2017 at 7:52 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSQA/status/874172457053073408
Jun 12, 2017 at 1:45 answer added candied_orange timeline score: 45
Jun 12, 2017 at 1:41 answer added alecxe timeline score: 12
Jun 11, 2017 at 23:12 answer added Yu Zhang timeline score: 20
Jun 11, 2017 at 20:41 answer added FDM timeline score: 11
Jun 11, 2017 at 20:03 history edited erik339 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 27 characters in body
Jun 11, 2017 at 19:56 history edited erik339 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 302 characters in body
Jun 11, 2017 at 19:51 review First posts
Jun 11, 2017 at 22:21
Jun 11, 2017 at 19:49 history asked erik339 CC BY-SA 3.0