Timeline for How do you design UI automated tests to pick alternative steps randomly in a flow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 8, 2018 at 12:56 | history | edited | Peter M. - stands for Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 185 characters in body
|
May 8, 2018 at 12:50 | comment | added | Peter M. - stands for Monica | @VishalAggarwal - added blurb about random workflow. Complexity increases significantly, only you can tell if it is worth it. | |
May 8, 2018 at 12:49 | history | edited | Peter M. - stands for Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 185 characters in body
|
May 8, 2018 at 9:41 | comment | added | Vishal Aggarwal | Your points seems more on random data selection instead of steps itself. | |
May 8, 2018 at 9:38 | comment | added | Vishal Aggarwal | +1 , I see that by adding randomness ,the tests might become more flakey(if not handled carefully). However my question is around more on technical side instead of domain side where in a end to end user journey, there are numerous alternative steps which all reach ultimately to same user end goal. | |
May 2, 2018 at 13:49 | history | answered | Peter M. - stands for Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |