It's mentioned in the documentation mentioned in the comment section, I recommend reading it. Speficially, you can read this part about closures.

What you can do is to put the other cy.get() inside the first one:

cy
  .get('...')
  .then($today => {
    
    cy
      .get('...')
      .then($tomorrow => {
        // you have access to both $today and $tomorrow
    });
});

I shortened the code (e.g. didn't use the long selectors) in order to focus on the main point.

It's mentioned in the documentation mentioned in the comment section, I recommend reading it. Specifically, you can read this part about closures.

What you can do is to put the other cy.get() inside the first one:

cy
  .get('...')
  .then($today => {
    
    cy
      .get('...')
      .then($tomorrow => {
        // you have access to both $today and $tomorrow
    });
});

I shortened the code (e.g. didn't use the long selectors) in order to focus on the main point.

It's mentioned in the documentation mentioned in the comment section, I recommend reading it. Speficially, you can read this part about closures.

What you can do is put the other cy.get() inside the first one:

cy
  .get('...')
  .then($today => {
    
    cy
      .get('...')
      .then($tomorrow => {
        // you have access to both $today and $tomorrow
    });
});

I shortened the code (e.g. didn't use the long selectors) in order to focus on the main point.

It's mentioned in the documentation mentioned in the comment section, I recommend reading it. Speficially, you can read this part about closures.

What you can do is to put the other cy.get() inside the first one:

cy
  .get('...')
  .then($today => {
    
    cy
      .get('...')
      .then($tomorrow => {
        // you have access to both $today and $tomorrow
    });
});

I shortened the code (e.g. didn't use the long selectors) in order to focus on the main point.