Timeline for Should bugs found by exploratory test methods be taken against QA?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2021 at 17:05 | comment | added | Amazon Dies In Darkness | @GregBurghardt Unfortunately, the unscrupulous practice of planned bugs still exists today. Bugs are intentionally introduced (or not fixed) so that fees can be charged (to clients or end users) to fix them. It's an ugly practice. | |
| Dec 3, 2021 at 15:59 | comment | added | Greg Burghardt | "counting unplanned bugs" - is there such a things as a planned bug? I hope not... | |
| Dec 2, 2021 at 22:34 | comment | added | Austin Hemmelgarn | Adding to the ‘count what matters’, a lot of people also tend to misuse metrics . Alongside the KLOC example, one of my favorite examples of this is people who try to use daily changes in Docker pulls as counted by Docker Hub to count the number of active users of a container, which is absolutely not what that metrics means for multiple reasons. | |
| Dec 2, 2021 at 20:09 | comment | added | A. I. Breveleri | "Microsoft would want to improve the code and IBM employees would resist because changes that didn't increase the KLOC count were not valued." - Thank you, I did not know this. All these years I've been blaming Microsoft for that hot steaming mess. | |
| S Dec 1, 2021 at 21:57 | review | First answers | |||
| Dec 1, 2021 at 23:38 | |||||
| S Dec 1, 2021 at 21:57 | history | answered | Walter | CC BY-SA 4.0 |