Timeline for Web Application Quality Metrics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2013 at 12:21 | vote | accept | p0wl | ||
| Mar 22, 2013 at 23:59 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | Perhaps these will help: e-valid.com/Technology/White.Papers/website.quality.html "A WebSite is like any piece of software: no single, all-inclusive quality measure applies, and even multiple quality metrics may not apply." w3c.it/papers/cmg2005Poland-quality.pdf cibl-tcl.com/Documents/Research%20Papers/… infocarnivore.com/… "As a mathematician I hate to say it, but the best tool for evaluating a site is still the human eye." | |
| Mar 22, 2013 at 23:49 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | Search for web quality metrics and you'll find hundreds, if not thousands. Pick the ones that you think are meaningful, then rate away. I suppose you could find a book by some "expert" who think certain metrics mean more than others ("web pages should load in less than 4 seconds"), but really, it's all about context, not universal metrics. | |
| Mar 22, 2013 at 22:32 | comment | added | p0wl | The problem is, I don't want to promote, I want to rate the technology based on objective and reliable metrics, therefore I don't want to define them by myself, but learn and quote from an expert / book / consortium / standard. | |
| Mar 22, 2013 at 16:51 | history | answered | Joe Strazzere | CC BY-SA 3.0 |