1

I'm currently evaluating a QA tool for our company's QA Team; I don't have much experience in this area so many things are new for me and probably there are many reasons for what I consider a design problem in our case.

The "problem" is that in all the tools I have seen or installed, the information is grouped project by project, and uses cases like getting a metric of how many tests were run in a week by each member of the team, independent of the project, requires me to build a report for each project and then aggregate the info outside of the tool (or make SQL Scripts to "add" the info).

Also, if we define a test like "withdraw from an mutual fund", and we want to use that definition in more than one project, let's say a standalone front-office application and an internet mobile application for our clients, then we have to re-write the test for each case. What I would expect here is to have a "test definition" and a "test implementation", so if I change the definition I get some kind of warning that the X number of implementations should be reviewed.

At the end, we need to manage a QA team, and to reuse knowledge where possible, but the "project" does not translate accurately to our needs, or maybe I am miss understanding many things and there is another way to organize info into "projects" that could meet our needs.

Any idea or reference would be appreciated.

closed as too broad by NarendraC, IAmMilinPatel, Bharat Mane, Chris Kenst, Shailendra Rathore Jan 3 '17 at 9:05

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Who cares how great the team is doing when the project is failing. In the end it is always the value for the end-user that is important in software. – Niels van Reijmersdal Dec 26 '16 at 22:48
  • Agree Niels. We are always taking efforts to make project successful considering releases & objectives. Those are for Projects and Not for teams. Voting to close – NarendraC Dec 27 '16 at 5:04
  • 1
    Basically because two mayor factors; if you are managing a team you need to know how well you are doing with your team, and project that info through months and even years. The other factor is that if a test is designed for business case, that test can and should be replicated across all software implementations, regardless of the project. A withdraw from a mutual fund is the same business case, that has different implementations in mobile, web, or front-end business app. – Patricio Téllez Dec 27 '16 at 12:24