2

After a long road with Randoop.NET as a unit test suggestion tool, my developing team has decided to upgrade to a commercial tool which will provide us a full unit testing framework for professional TDD workflow.

  • super important for it to include a well-performing runner AND a mocking framework, the coverage part is less relevant but can be an advantage.
  • must be super userfriendly and easy to manage but yet powerful and efficient.

P.S - We work on VS2017 with .net framework

Thanks for any help!

  • So you have decide to purchase a commercial tool, but you are asking us which one? – FDM Jun 3 '18 at 19:15
  • Poeerful in what sense? Efficient in what sense? – dzieciou Oct 2 '18 at 5:31
1

The problem with fuzz testing is that it inefficiently tries input onto your target code, tries to be as smart as a human in test design.

If we are thinking about TDD (i.e. have a coverage which enables us to modify our software with a mitigated risk of regression), mutation testing is an appropriated techinique.

In the C# world, Visual Mutator is highly recommended. NinjaTurtlesMutation seems to be a good tool as well.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.