public class DriverFactory {

    public WebDriver driver;

    public static ThreadLocal<WebDriver> tlDriver = new ThreadLocal<>();

     * This method is used to initialize the threadlocal driver on the basis of given
     * browser
     * @param browser
     * @return this will return tldriver.
    public WebDriver init_driver(String browser) {

        System.out.println("browser value is: " + browser);

        if (browser.equals("chrome")) {
            tlDriver.set(new ChromeDriver());
        } else if (browser.equals("firefox")) {
            tlDriver.set(new FirefoxDriver());
        } else if (browser.equals("safari")) {
            tlDriver.set(new SafariDriver());
        } else {
            System.out.println("Please pass the correct browser value: " + browser);

        return getDriver();


     * this is used to get the driver with ThreadLocal
     * @return
    public static synchronized WebDriver getDriver() {
        return tlDriver.get();

3 Answers 3


getDriver().manage().deleteAllCookies(); in the init_driver method seems to be where the NullPointerException is occurring.

It looks like the tlDriver has not been initialized in the code, hence getDriver() returns null. This can be fixed by ensuring that a driver instance is set before it is used. For example, you can add the following code before line 26:

if (tlDriver.get() == null) {
    System.out.println("Driver is null, please initialize it first");
    return null;

Check your property file, you may have not set the below key-value

#Browser config:
browser = chrome

Property file location:

enter image description here

You may have the below code in your ApplicationHooks class. browserName variable seems to be null. Hence you are getting NPE when you call the method driverFactory.init_driver

    public void launchBrowser() {
        String browserName = prop.getProperty("browser");
        driverFactory = new DriverFactory();
        driver = driverFactory.init_driver(browserName);

Note- I happened to have the same framework(source code), hence am very particularly specifying the other parts of the code which you have not even mentioned in your question.


We generally tend to encounter this issue when we used to test web applications during our outsourced software testing project.

I have one approach to solving the problem you are facing. Sharing the code snippet in below example:

    import org.openqa.selenium.WebDriver;
    import org.openqa.selenium.chrome.ChromeDriver;

    public class ChromeDriverThreadLocal {
    private static final String CHROME_DRIVER_PATH = "/path/to/chromedriver";
    private static final ThreadLocal<WebDriver> driver = new ThreadLocal<>();
    public static WebDriver getDriver() {
        if (driver.get() == null) {
            System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", CHROME_DRIVER_PATH);
            driver.set(new ChromeDriver());
        return driver.get();

In this example, each thread will have its own instance of ChromeDriver that is accessible through the getDriver() method. This ensures that the driver instance is thread-safe and can be used by multiple threads without conflicting with each other. Similarly, you can also add other browser capabilities as well.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.