Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Behavior driven development (or BDD) is an agile software development technique that encourages collaboration between developers, QA and non-technical or business participants in a software project.
3
votes
1
answer
373
views
BDD Test Plans: Should features be the same User Stories?
So I'm somewhat new to the BDD world. I've been using Cucumber a little bit for automated testing, but I'm unable to automate everything due to general manpower/time restrictions. …
6
votes
2
answers
326
views
Style of acceptance test cases? (BDD)
I'm not sure if this is the right way to go (Although I love the BDD methodology and I want to try it). … I'm not really looking for a "Which is better" but more of a "Which makes more sense for BDD" or "advantages/disadvantages" …
2
votes
4
answers
20k
views
Cucumber: Multiple vs One step definitions file?
Im trying to figure out what the better way to do this is? On one hand separating your step definitions based on the different feature tests is nice for organization (or in case one breaks and you nee …
4
votes
1
answer
332
views
BDD Acceptance Tests feel....short?
So I'm newly adapted to BDD and have been using Cucumber for Test Automation, but I also use the "Gherkin" style for writing acceptance tests (that I will hopefully be able to automate in the future, but … I mean I'm pretty new to the BDD style/Gherkin style of writing. But I mean it gets the point across, I just look at it and it looks so short.
Maybe that's the point however? …