I believe it is important to look at test coverage at something that
Needs to be adjusted as features grow and change (proactive)
as opposed to
Ensuring that things that happened in the past are prevented (or at least detected) by adding tests for them (reactive)
The problem with the second approach (particularly common in traditional waterfall and command &...
As testers we won't set hard boundaries for testing, that's why organisations push for test automation, CI/CD and so on. We expect to get 100% (almost) test or feature coverage for each new build.
But if you are in an organisation that doesn't have test automation then some times test completion deadlines could make you feel challenged. In such cases, few ...
Below are the few test cases that used by QA in software testing company to test the Payment systems:
Check what happens if payment gateway stops responding during payment
Check what happens if payment process fails
Check what happens if internet stop during payment process
Check what happens if user close the application portal during
I was able to send the basic input as per my requirement using Karate tool.
Below is the code I modified as per my requirement from the example provided in the documentation, I have used Karate archtype to create this maven project and updated the karate-config.js as per the latest documentation:
Feature File Code
@ignore Feature: wspoctest
Every software testing company uses both test automation and functional testing to handle these kinds of situations to cover 100% of the feature coverage.
However, if we don't have automated scripts then for those cases we can perform smoke, sanity and regression testing:
Smoke testing: In this, we decide if the QA build is stable and all critical areas of ...