11
votes
Should we do peer reviewing with end-to-end tests?
Just add on to the answer, a peer review is not just about the code review. It helps in:
Identifying improvements in code logic
Identifying improvements or missed application logic in the test
script....
- 11k
4
votes
Should we do peer reviewing with end-to-end tests?
From my experience, it's useful to do the peer review for the test cases (review the test design itself).
If you automate the e2e tests, the code should be reviewed as well.
If you want to have a ...
4
votes
Should we do peer reviewing with end-to-end tests?
But I want to know if there are other reason.
I can think of some that I have personally encountered:
tight budget, so business people will not give you the necessary time for reviews even if it ...
- 4,538
1
vote
What is a good test review process for sporadic failures
Only a consistently manually reproducible bug with specific given
steps should be logged in the system.
If a bug found through manual or automated testing is not consistently reproducible then it ...
- 5,552
1
vote
What is a good test review process for sporadic failures
From what you have written, I'm not certain if you mean bugs in the test code, or bugs in the product. I think it's important to distinguish between the two.
Every QA team has different processes.
...
- 4,538
1
vote
Accepted
Handling of Test Documents throughout Retests
Given the mandate to use Microsoft Office, I'd look at using spreadsheets to manage the test execution, working something like this:
The master list of all test cases for the project is either a Word ...
- 31.5k
1
vote
Handling of Test Documents throughout Retests
This is a huge question!
I've worked at similar places where they want a QA team to work without the QA tools like bug-tracking software, for example.
If you're being forced to use Microsoft Office, ...
- 2,508
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible