Timeline for Issue tracking - project version tracking
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2013 at 8:56 | vote | accept | JamesStuddart | ||
| Oct 28, 2013 at 8:56 | comment | added | JamesStuddart | Thanks for the input Joe, I do think the manual field is what I will need to do. | |
| Oct 26, 2013 at 13:08 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | @JamesStuddart - then manual is the way to go. Create a central document that everyone can access containing the "current" build number. Everyone who creates a build increments this number, then uses it. No more "disjointed" build numbers. | |
| Oct 26, 2013 at 2:53 | answer | added | DeonHeyns | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 8:07 | comment | added | JamesStuddart | Are you not reading my posts? I have said I am unable to setup a build server, this is a business issue not my capabilities lacking here. I have been pushing for a build server but getting new hardware is a PITA here. Thats why I need an intermediate solution for the issue. | |
| Oct 24, 2013 at 18:51 | comment | added | Sam Woods | I think Joe is still right. Your other options wouldn't be any better or less expensive than just setting up a build server. It's pretty simple to do these days and there are plenty of free options. | |
| Oct 24, 2013 at 15:46 | comment | added | JamesStuddart | Yes I know that is the best way... I said that in the post. But at this moment in time thats not a possible option | |
| Oct 24, 2013 at 15:20 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | A build server is the best way. Manually setting the build number to match some centrally agreed-upon value would work as well. | |
| Oct 24, 2013 at 15:07 | comment | added | JamesStuddart | we would need a build server to achieve this to some extent. also when building locally your build number increments independent of other machines? | |
| Oct 24, 2013 at 14:59 | comment | added | Joe Strazzere | Is there a reason you don't want to fix the "disjointed build number" problem first, and use more team-wide build number that has real meaning? | |
| Oct 24, 2013 at 14:43 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 24, 2013 at 17:38 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2013 at 14:25 | history | asked | JamesStuddart | CC BY-SA 3.0 |